Home » Market Review | Greater Louisville’s legal scene is a ‘sophisticated’ environment

Market Review | Greater Louisville’s legal scene is a ‘sophisticated’ environment

By Robert Hadley

Screen Shot 2017-07-18 at 11.13.29 AM

The legal environment in Louisville has seen its share of growth in the last few years, with the introduction of courtroom technology, the addition of a global services center for international law firm Hogan Lovells and a recovering economy providing more job opportunities for lawyers.

Hogan Lovells inked a 10-year lease in Paragon Place on Shelbyville Road in eastern Jefferson County, far from the hotbed of the city’s downtown Central Business District. The location of the 30,000-s.f. office signals that calling the behemoth firm a direct competitor with local lawyers may be a bit premature.

MRGLSI2017-300Don Kelly, managing partner of Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs LLP, said all signs point to the firm, which employs 2,500 worldwide across more than 40 countries, being a boon rather than a bane to the overall market.

“They’re not really opening a legal office per se,” Kelly said. “Our understanding is that they’re bringing ‘back-end operations’ – accounting, conflict management, administration – as opposed to a legal presence.”

Kelly based his comments on meetings where staff at both firms explored  opportunities to coordinate work and make introductions in the community.

“I’m always happy to have other people training people who could help us in business as well,” Kelly said.

High tech enhances the practice of law

In terms of legal expertise, Kelly gave the Metro high marks.

“I think the legal environment here is sophisticated,” he said. “The top-end work here is as good as anywhere. Obviously, there’s not the deal size you might have in New York City, but for the size of the market, I’d say it’s very good here.”

Larger cities may have more Fortune 500 and Fortune 1000 firms, along with the greater volume of high-dollar work they generate. But Kelly pointed out an advantage Louisville has: lower costs.

“We’re blessed to have a rate structure in Louisville that is very favorable for clients compared to New York, Washington, Chicago, even Columbus or Atlanta,” he said. “Our fees would be substantially lower than those cities.”

If competitive rates lure some work to law firms in the metro, the same cannot be said for the almost Hollywood-style courtroom technology that not only videotapes the entire trial (a feature of many Kentucky courtrooms), but allows TV-style graphic capabilities for displaying documents to jurors.

“I think a trial is a production,” said Patrick Michael, a partner in the litigation department of Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. “I’m here to get (jurors’) attention and keep them learning so they’re not bored.”

As appealing as the high-tech wizardry of the Jefferson County courtrooms proves to be, lawyers cannot choose to try a case there just to have the benefit of the new technology.

Yet the presence of the advanced audio-visual systems does make Louisville a training site, both for up-and-coming counselors and those from elsewhere in Kentucky trying a case in the specially equipped venues. That helps keep the city at the forefront.

“We teach a class once a month on how to use the JCUP system,” Michael said. “But it’s literally so easy a 5-year-old could do it.”

JCUP refers to the Jefferson Courtroom Upgrade Project, an $800,000 privately funded effort that enhanced the statewide audiovisual systems already in place in courtrooms by adding the ability to project images from a laptop or document camera to a 47-inch flat-screen monitor, aiding in jurors’ comprehension of the case.

In articles published in LawTechnology.org and Bench & Bar, the Kentucky Bar Association’s journal, Michael mentioned two studies, one by the National University of Taiwan and the other by the University of North Texas, that show students learn better with audiovisual systems.

In citing the studies, Michael draws a parallel between students and jurors, who he says are raised on smartphones and tablets and would be hard to engage with pencil-and-paper presentation methods.

“That’s the world live in now,” Michael said. “If you’re not working on that level, you’re being left behind.”

Ackerson & Yann PLLC


Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP


Boehl Stopher & Graves LLP


Camoriano & Associates


Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan PLLC


Dinsmore & Shohl LLP


Dressman Benzinger Lavelle PSC


Fisher & Phillips LLP


Frost Brown Todd LLC


Fultz Maddox Hovious & Dickens PLC


Goldberg & Simpson


Gwin Steinmetz & Baird PLLC


Hogan Lovells


Landrum & Shouse LLP


Lynch Cox Gilman & Goodman PSC


McBrayer, McGinnis,
Leslie & Kirkland PLLC


Middleton Reutlinger


Morgan & Pottinger PSC


O’Bryan, Brown & Toner PLLC


Phillips Parker Orberson & Arnett PLC


Schiller Osbourn Barnes & Maoney PLLC


Seiller Waterman LLC


Stites & Harbison PLLC


Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC


Thompson Miller & Simpson PLC


Tilford Dobbins Alexander PLLC


Ward, Hocker & Thornton PLLC


Weber & Rose PSC


Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs LLP


Zielke Law Firm PLLC