Home » Horseracing Integrity Act introduced to end doping, curb horse deaths

Horseracing Integrity Act introduced to end doping, curb horse deaths

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, bipartisan U.S. Senators Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and Martha McSally (R-AZ), who represent two of the top horse racing states in the U.S., introduced the Horseracing Integrity Act to end the doping of American race horses and create a uniform national standard for drug testing that would be overseen by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA).

“Horses should run on hay, oats, and water, not on a cocktail of performance enhancers and medications,” said Marty Irby, executive director of Animal Wellness Action. “We applaud Senators Gillibrand and McSally and are pleased to join together to end a shameful period where unscrupulous trainers have put horses and jockeys at risk.”

“The Jockey Club is grateful to Senators Gillibrand and McSally for their support and for introducing the Horseracing Integrity Act to the Senate,” said Jim Gagliano, president and chief operating officer, The Jockey Club. “The Horseracing Integrity Act is the only solution to improving the welfare of horses across all racing jurisdictions and achieving comprehensive reform in the sport of Thoroughbred racing.”

The Horseracing Integrity Act is backed by the Coalition for Horse Racing Integrity, which includes Animal Wellness Action, The Jockey Club, The Breeders’ Cup, The Preakness Stakes (Stronach Group), The Belmont Stakes (New York Racing Association), Keeneland, and the Water Hay Oats Alliance.  Uniform oversight and regulation of the industry are needed to stop unethical trainers and veterinarians from doping horses to improve their chances of winning. The Horseracing Integrity Act can achieve this goal. It’s House companion bill, H.R. 1754, introduced earlier this year by U.S. Reps. Paul Tonko (D-NY) and Andy Barr (R-KY) has garnered 113 cosponsors in the U.S. House.

The horse racing industry has no unified regulatory system, unlike the NFL and other major sports, and it is governed by a contradictory patchwork of state laws and regulations.  Imagine if all 32 professional football teams had different sets of rules in each stadium. That is exactly the situation in each of the 38 state racing jurisdictions throughout the United States. State racing commissions allow various medications and levels of permissible medications that vary widely.